First England set up the Commonwealth and most of the developing countries are members of the Commonwealth, or is it wealth from Commoners? Most of these nations are also in the G20.
I read about Bill Gates' report and there was a mighty urging pouring
He wants the world's richest leaders (?) to maintain their commitments to "international aid" and he
focuses on how the G20 can assist those countries to expand their own revenue bases and ultimately achieve self-reliance also (?) He is also proposing new taxes on financial transactions, tobacco, and transport.
Apparently, his report lends a bright spot in an otherwise bleak summit for the world's "poor"
Let me ask questions; Is the G7 part of the G20? Also from which group are these so-called rich leaders?
At the same time, Bill Gates failed to mention getting rid of tax havens and tax dodging by multinational companies.
Already and currently the world's nations are focused on the Euro crisis. However, Bill Gates wants the G20 to be more concerned about requiring mining and oil companies to be listed on the G20 stock exchanges to disclose payments to their governments. Keep in mind the G20 nations are from the "developing nations group"
Apparently, "poor" nations are losing three times as much as they receive in "aid" The only way that this could be true is if the "aid" is a "bribe" from multinational companies, or because of them doing business IN those "poor" countries.
Bill Gates is saying that the G20/developing nations must recognize that tax dodging multinational companies keeps them dependent on "aid"
I have a solution; switch the amount in "aid" over to what multinational companies should be getting from doing business in those nations and let those developing and "poor" nations receive their rightful, sovereign, amount from those multinational companies, and that amount is triple the amount of the "aid"that those nations lose when their wealth is stolen from them. The rich leaders of the world have been in those developing countries and "poor" nations for centuries making a profit, they are probably also double dipping and may be also getting some of the "aid" plus, it is in those countries where most wars begin.
I am wondering who exactly is a "rebel", or who is not a "rebel" (on the topic about rebel,)
I am asking; Is the "rebel" Democratic, into Globalization, Capitalism, militaristic, or a demonic philosopher because, I am taking note that the "rebel" happens to have the same characteristics in whichever nation the "rebel" is terrorizing. So, the real question is who is the instigator of the "rebel"?
Marsha Anderson
